How to Discuss a Recent M&A Deal in Your IB Interview (Free Template)
7 min read
"Walk me through a recent deal you've followed" is one of the most predictable questions in investment banking interviews. It's also one where candidates lose points by rambling, reciting a headline, or freezing when the interviewer asks "So, was it a good deal?"
The good news: you can prepare this answer in advance with a simple five-part template. Below you'll get the structure, a full example answer, the follow-up questions to expect, and the mistakes that quietly sink candidates.
Why Interviewers Ask This Question
Bankers aren't testing whether you memorized a press release. They want to know three things:
- Are you genuinely interested in deals? People who follow markets can talk about transactions without notes.
- Can you think like an advisor? That means understanding why a buyer pays a certain price, not just what it paid.
- Can you communicate clearly? Clients get short, structured answers. So should your interviewer.
Keep that in mind and your answer will naturally sound sharper.
How to Pick the Right Deal
Your deal choice matters almost as much as your delivery. Here's what to look for:
- Recent: ideally announced within the last 6 to 12 months. Older deals are fine if something new happened, like a regulatory decision or closing.
- Big enough to have information: public companies publish press releases, investor presentations and merger filings. Tiny private deals leave you guessing.
- Relevant to the bank or group: interviewing with a healthcare team? Have a healthcare deal ready. Bonus points if the bank advised on it, but be careful: they may know the deal far better than you.
- Something you understand: a complex biotech royalty structure is risky if you can't explain it under pressure.
Pro tip: prepare two deals. One you like (a smart acquisition) and one you'd criticize (an overpriced or risky one). It shows judgment, and it saves you if the interviewer has already heard about your first choice from five other candidates.
The 5-Part Template
Think of this as a pyramid: start with the facts, then layer on analysis, then end with your opinion.
1. The Headline (10 to 15 seconds)
State the basics in one or two sentences:
- Who acquired whom
- Deal value (and whether that's equity value or enterprise value)
- Consideration: all cash, all stock, or a mix
- When it was announced and its current status (pending, closed, blocked)
Don't overload this part. The goal is to orient your listener.
2. The Strategic Rationale (20 to 30 seconds)
Why did the buyer want this target? Common reasons include:
- Revenue growth: entering a new market, geography or customer segment
- Cost synergies: combining overlapping functions like sales, back office or manufacturing
- Capabilities or technology: buying something faster than building it
- Defensive moves: keeping a target out of a competitor's hands
- Financial buyer logic: for private equity deals, think stable cash flows, debt capacity and a path to exit
Pick the two or three reasons that actually matter. Listing seven sounds like you copied a press release.
3. Valuation and Terms (20 to 30 seconds)
This is where you prove you're thinking like a banker. Cover what you can find reliably:
- Premium paid: offer price versus the target's undisturbed share price
- Multiples: EV/EBITDA or EV/Revenue, compared with peers or similar past deals
- Financing: cash on hand, new debt, or issuing shares
- Notable terms: breakup fees, earnouts, divestitures required by regulators
Quick worked example on the premium: say a target traded at $40 per share before rumors leaked, and the buyer offers $52.
Premium = ($52 − $40) / $40 = 30%
Now you can say something useful: "That's a meaningful premium, so the buyer is clearly betting on synergies to justify it."
A word of caution: use the undisturbed price (before deal news leaked). If you use the price after the stock already jumped on rumors, you'll understate the premium.
4. Risks and Reactions (15 to 20 seconds)
Every deal has weak spots. Mention one or two:
- Regulatory risk: antitrust reviews in the US, UK or EU
- Integration risk: culture clashes, systems, key employee departures
- Financing risk: heavy debt in a high interest rate environment
- Market reaction: did the buyer's stock fall on announcement? That often signals investors think it overpaid.
5. Your Take (15 to 20 seconds)
This is the part most candidates skip, and it's the part interviewers remember. Answer one question: Was it a good deal, and why?
You don't need to be "right." You need a clear view backed by a reason. "I think it makes sense because..." or "I'd be cautious because..." both work.
Full Example: Microsoft and Activision Blizzard
This deal is no longer recent, but it's a great illustration because every part of the template has real substance. Use it to practice the structure, then apply it to a current deal.
Here's what a strong answer sounds like:
Headline: "In January 2022, Microsoft announced it would acquire Activision Blizzard for $95 per share in an all-cash deal, valuing the transaction at roughly $68.7 billion including Activision's net cash. After a long regulatory process, it closed in October 2023."
Rationale: "The strategic logic had a few pieces. First, content: franchises like Call of Duty and World of Warcraft strengthen Xbox and its Game Pass subscription service. Second, mobile: Activision owns King, the maker of Candy Crush, which gave Microsoft real scale in mobile gaming, the fastest growing part of the industry. Microsoft said the deal would make it the third-largest gaming company by revenue, behind Tencent and Sony."
Valuation and terms: "The $95 offer was about a 45% premium to Activision's closing price right before the announcement. Microsoft paid entirely in cash, which it could easily afford given its balance sheet, so there was no dilution for its shareholders."
Risks: "The big risk was regulatory. The FTC sued to block the deal and lost its bid for a preliminary injunction, and the UK's CMA initially blocked it. Microsoft ultimately restructured the deal by selling the cloud streaming rights for Activision's games outside the European Economic Area to Ubisoft, which got the CMA comfortable."
My take: "I think it was a smart deal strategically because Microsoft was buying proven content and a mobile foothold it would have struggled to build itself. The main lesson for me is how much regulatory risk can stretch a timeline: almost two years from announcement to close, with deal terms changing along the way."
That's roughly 90 seconds spoken aloud. Clear, structured, opinionated.
A Fill-in-the-Blank Version You Can Use
Copy this into your notes and fill it out for each deal you prepare:
- "[Buyer] announced it would acquire [Target] for [$ value / $ per share] in an [all cash / all stock / mixed] deal in [month, year]. The deal is currently [pending / closed]."
- "The main rationale is [reason 1] and [reason 2]."
- "The price represents a [X]% premium and roughly [X]x EBITDA, which is [high / in line / low] versus [peers or past deals]. It's being financed with [cash / debt / stock]."
- "The key risk is [regulatory / integration / financing], and the market reacted by [buyer stock up or down]."
- "Overall, I think it's a [good / questionable] deal because [one clear reason]."
Follow-Up Questions to Expect
Your first answer opens the door. Be ready for these:
- "Why cash instead of stock (or vice versa)?" Cash signals confidence and avoids dilution. Stock shares the risk with target shareholders and preserves the buyer's cash, often used when the buyer's shares are richly valued.
- "Is the deal accretive or dilutive?" Compare the buyer's cost of financing with what it's acquiring. If the target's earnings yield (its earnings divided by the purchase price) beats the buyer's after-tax cost of debt or the buyer's own earnings yield when using stock, the deal tends to be accretive to EPS before synergies.
- "What would you have done differently?" Have one idea ready, like paying with more stock to reduce leverage, or negotiating a lower premium.
- "Who advised on the deal?" Look this up. Not knowing is fine, but knowing looks prepared.
- "What are the comparable transactions?" Name one or two similar deals in the same sector if you can.
Common Mistakes to Avoid
- Reading the press release back: "The combination creates a leading platform with compelling value" says nothing. Use your own words.
- Getting numbers wrong: if you're unsure about a multiple, skip it. A wrong figure hurts more than a missing one.
- No opinion: "It's interesting" isn't a take. Commit to a view.
- Going too long: aim for 60 to 90 seconds, then let the interviewer steer.
- Picking a deal you can't defend: if you can't answer two layers of follow-ups, choose something simpler.
How to Prepare in One Evening
- Pick two deals in sectors relevant to your interviews.
- Read the primary sources: the announcement press release and the investor presentation. These usually state the rationale, value and financing directly.
- Calculate the premium yourself using the undisturbed share price.
- Check the market reaction by looking at both stocks around the announcement date.
- Fill out the template above for each deal.
- Say it out loud three or four times and time yourself. It feels awkward, but it's the difference between sounding rehearsed and sounding fluent.
The Bottom Line
The deal question rewards preparation more than almost any other interview question. Facts first, then rationale, valuation, risks, and finally your own view. Nail that structure with two solid deals, and you'll turn a predictable question into one of the strongest moments of your interview.